www.clotrimoxazole.com Review:
http://medicalsystems-service.com/w/www.clotrimoxazole.com.html
http://medicalsystems-service.com/w/www.clotrimoxazole.com.html
Clotrimoxazole.com - The official site for clotrimoxazole information - The reference site for clotrimoxazole including news articles, images, and updated information
Country: 54.243.51.136, North America, US
City: -77.4728 Virginia, United States
I have both the 2012 and 2013 editions (the 2nd was a gift). The bottom line is that there is no real functional difference between the two despite any changes that were made. It is the same book, slightly different. Here is my complaint: this book has quite a few "editors" and "contributors" who seem to be medical students. Great class project and all, but the lack of editing shows a lack of concern from Le, Bhushan, and Hofmann for the quality of the finished product. For example, 2012 had such a list of errata it is hard to believe that anyone checked any facts before printing and selling the product. Although 2013 seems to have fewer errors, it has reprinted some of the exact same ones from 2012! No one even checked the previous errata list? I mean, it was really long and all, but they are asking for more money from us, right?
After at least 4 hours of multiple attempts to install the software to run my new Neat scanner I remain frustrated and extremely disappointed in this product.
I first saw this movie in the $4 "please take this garbage off our hands" bin at the store I work at.There were some stills of some pretty nifty looking special effects on the cover.
Having just begun preparing for Step I (May 29 is the day!), I eagerly picked up the newest copy of First Aid. And by newest copy, I'm referring to the actual physical text, not the Kindle version. I've been working with the 2012 edition, but picked up the 2013 edition as I plan on doing Doctor's In Training 2013, and they require the most up-to-date text. I haven't read the book through in earnest yet, but from my quick skimmings, what I have noticed is that most of the content is very similar to the 2012 edition, except that the HUGE list of errata from the 2012 edition has been corrected. Other than that, you'll find a few picture tweaks here and there, but nothing major. I did notice the cover is made of a newer material this year, which is much hardier than previous editions, not to mention more "spill-proof."